Councillor Steve Count

Personal news and views from the Conservative Leader of the opposition at Cambridgeshire County Council


Leave a comment

Conservatives to invest almost £22m in Highways

The Labour and Liberal Democrat administration know the roads are failing but they refuse to do enough about it. Recently, acknowledging their budget falls short of what is needed, whilst laying the blame elsewhere. But we know residents are tired of them blaming the weather, the lack of money, and the Government. Residents don’t want to pay around £2,000 a household to hear their excuses; they want action now. This is why the Conservatives have put forward plans to rescue their insufficient proposals with a £21.716m investment into highways.

For many years Labour and lib Dems have repeatedly voted against Conservative proposed increases to the highways budgets, preferring to spend monies elsewhere. Perhaps one day they will perform a U-Turn on their war on motorists, as they have this year with their U turn regarding their disastrous “let weeds grow” policy, and their dangerous proposals to cut winter gritting routes, which we campaigned against.

In this budget, Liberal Democrats and Labour want to once again impose a maximum Tax increase, they say “to close a budget gap of £37.1m”. However, a lot of this is of their own creation. Cost overruns on energy schemes added £9.1m, late delivery meant lost revenue of £11.4m. Another expensive mistake was their campaign to stay in Shire Hall, scuppering a commercial deal, costing Taxpayers tens of millions of pounds. Their refusal to continue working with Peterborough led to millions spent on increased senior management costs and exit payments to officers.

Labour stated, even if the budget was balanced, they would impose a maximum Tax increase. At a cost of an additional £1.733m a year their decision to voluntarily pay above the National Living wage, is similar to Liberal Democrats policy in South Cambs. Believing Taxpayers should pay five days wages for four days work.  Further examples are Government financed schemes were deliberately enhanced as another self-imposed cost of £3.0m to the Cambridgeshire Council Taxpayer. Conservatives can easily demonstrate the element of self-reflection missing from Labour and Liberal Democrats narrative over who, and why, the council is now facing such a budget gap.

 As Conservatives we also believe you need to efficiently utilise the resources you do have. For example, we propose to accelerate deployment of the Ukraine grant funds. The joint administration currently has £2m languishing in reserves, with no plans for its much needed use over the next 5 years. Whereas we would help more people and communities earlier when they need it most. We would also integrate the Public Health responsibilities into the Communities committee’s area of responsibility, enabling a reduction in administrative waste and a much more integrated approach closer to the people.

Highways operations, which includes roads, footpaths, cycleways, verges, drainage, signing and lineage and bridleways, takes our full proposed investment of £21.716m. Our detailed analysis of the budget plan has identified un-ringfenced reserves of £10.716m, sitting idle with no plans for the next five years, future funding commitments not included of £1.5m, overestimated budgets of £6m and capital receipts, surprisingly not included of £11.4m. From almost £30m we propose a steady and prudent drawdown of £21.716m to improve our highways, whilst the remaining £8m can be counted on to reduce any risks. Against our own desires we have been forced to chose not to propose a lower Council Tax, perhaps a forlorn hope of securing support. This leaves them a clear opportunity to vote to improve our highways and byways, and do what residents want. We hope that concession, may be enough to sway the Labour and Liberal Democrats ultimately in charge of the budget.


Leave a comment

Weeds are destroying our Towns and Villages

I am sure you have become aware recently of the dreadful state of our roads, pavements and cycleways due to weeds. This is entirely due to a change in policy the current joint administration forced through in February of this year. As part of that change they promised to engage with Parishes and Towns, but we have seen no evidence of that at all. The County Council have stopped all cyclic weedkilling (ie annual spraying) as well as spraying before laying new surfaces such as slurry on footpaths. Residents across the county have asked us what we can do about it and we (the Conservative group) will present a motion to full council on October 17th. If you agree that the state of our roads, paths and cycleways are unacceptable and getting worse due to weeds can I ask for your help, by clicking the link below and signing the petition, as well as circulating as widely as possible.

https://shorturl.at/dkFTZ

Almost new footpath not sprayed beforehand, wasting your Taxpayers money!


Leave a comment

Concerned about flooding?

A Flood Groups Conference will take place on Thursday 21st September 2023 at Burgess Hall in St Ives from 10:15 to 16:30. The conference has been organised by the Flood Risk team and is open to any residents and community groups with an interest in learning more about flood resilience or establishing their own flood group. This conference follows on from a successful launch last year and will include talks and workshops by Cambridgeshire County Council, the Environment Agency, Anglian Water, Internal Drainage Boards and industry leading experts. We will also have the ‘Floodmobile’ at the event which is a vehicle demonstrating over 50 examples of flood resilience measures that householders and businesses can install. Tickets can be booked here Flood Groups Conference 2023 Tickets, Thu 21 Sep 2023 at 10:15 | Eventbrite


Leave a comment

Conservatives demand action on potholes!

Elections around the corner means candidates are out canvassing. What is the number one issue for residents, Potholes, Pavements and Potholes. Its never been this bad as far as I can remember is the oft quoted line on the doorstep. The dreadful state of our roads and their repairs are the responsibility of Labour, the Independents and Liberal Democrats who run the county Council. Often referred to as the Coalition of chaos, what is this coalition at the County doing about the absolutely dreadful state of our roads, cycleways and pavements?

Labour are crying crocodile tears into their spilt milk, blaming the Government for a lack of funding (When don’t they do that). Yet when they receive funding the spend it on other things. The coalition has cost the Council about up to £50m in pursuing political priorities that are not core services. Money that could be allocated to repairing the roads.

The Liberal Democrats along with Labour are trying to stop the daily motorist from actually driving their cars in the first place, by pursuing their plans for a congestion charge. Yet buses and cyclists need roads they can travel safely on as well. Never fear Liberal Democrat leader Cllr Lucy Nethsingha (Who lives in Cambridge) has the answer. If there is limited funding spend the money where there are plenty of cyclists (Cambridge!) rather than rural Fen roads. That was her Cambridge centric solution proposed live on air on the Jeremy Sallis show. That and other great leadership qualities were exhibited that morning with views expressed such as, Motorists will just have to get used to driving slower on bumpier roads.

The Independents, slow to criticise as they prop up Labour and Liberals by having signed away their independence straight after the election, by forming a group (of Independents) that agreed to be whipped by Labour and Liberal Democrats. But they were quick enough to agree to cut the highways maintenance budget by £710k in real terms this year and vote down the Conservative amendment calling for a £5m additional investment.

The Conservative group have had enough of excuses and are standing up for our residents who are sick and tired of the standards the Cambridge Centric coalition believe is good enough for our more rural areas. We have put forward a motion asking for immediate action. We have demanded an immediate investment of £3.617m allocated by Government to increase the pothole fund. We believe it is vital this money is used to increase funding for our roads, cycleway and pavements “Highways maintenance budget”. Last year at S&R committee the coalition forced through a vote to allocate the increase to pay off borrowing, rather than increase spending on maintenance as the money was clearly intended. This early action will help officers accelerate planning for expenditure in the Summer months when preventative action is more effective than delayed actions leading to reactive pothole filling.

Additionally we have asked the Chief Executive to treat this as a priority. Not only by taking a personal interest but to deliver an improvement plan prior to the July meeting of council. Our highways officers are understaffed and overstretched. We have been warning of the impact of this for almost two years and only now has the coalition bought forward a people strategy to try and deal with this. Unfortunately an action plan has still to be developed but the public cannot just keep waiting whilst the coalition shuffles papers around and unashamedly blames everything else but themselves. This also needs to deal with the quality and temporary nature of repairs, the coalition seem happy to accept. The lack of staff for oversight and the need to deliver an increased amount of pothole repairs are linked and needs resolving.

On the doorstep the residents demand action on highways maintenance. We’re not in charge but at least we are trying. We already know what the coalition are saying, it’s not our fault. A lack of action and a cut to the budget by them, I’m sorry but it definitely is!


Leave a comment

Saving a historic orchard and £180m, gets a second chance.

Councillors have to make decisions on behalf of the public. In order to make good decisions they need good evidence, which leads to a good debate. Unfortunately the County Council debate regarding the Cambourne to Cambridge (C2C) proposal from the Greater Cambridge Partnership failed on multiple counts. That is why I have asked the County Council to reconsider the decision it made not to compare the GCP scheme with the Cambridge Past Present and Future (CPPF) scheme again.

I have to ask why did so many councillors take the GCP line in their responses. For example, there is no room for a cycleway and a bus route the length of the road, when that is not and never was being proposed. The only reason I can think is members were invited to a briefing on the GCP proposal, but the administration at the County Council denied the CPPF the same opportunity to present. As the comparison is now a substantive motion I have asked the Chief Executive to arrange a members seminar to brief members on the CPPF proposal. I honestly feel that if members actually took the time out to consider what CPPF is saying they may change their mind. Whereas what they actually considered was pre-prepared responses from the GCP to be trotted out, without checking if they were accurate or not.

Whilst I could pick apart the debate on the day point by point, I think it’s important to concentrate on what is the benefit to revisit this decision with a fresh pair of eyes. If the CPPF proposal stands the rigour of the comparison and holds water, we could save a historic orchard just for starters. Apart form the obvious ecological damage proposed in ripping through the countryside, the GCP proposal destroys an ancient apple orchard. The GPC would also save somewhere close to £180m pounds. Think what improvements to public transport that could go towards instead. With their plans to impose a congestion charge being rejected by the public, they clearly now need all the money they can get. As their dreams of a implementing a massive Taxation on car drivers, is rapidly turning to dust. Additionally, the CPPF proposal could be built using current highways powers, shaving years off of the delivery timescale and thereby improving public transport now, not at some distant point in the future.

What if Labour, Liberal Democrats and the Independents decide once again not to compare the two routes and chop down an ancient orchard, spending £200m+ on a busway that doesn’t improve public transport to major employment sites such as the Bio Medical Campus. I cannot honestly see it going ahead. Treasury are keeping a close eye on devolved funding. The current proposal has a direct benefit cost ratio of 0.43. This means for every £1 of Taxpayers money spent on the scheme, the return is only 43pence. No-one should back this unless they have ruled out every possible alternative. Something the public inquiry will soon learn they haven’t.

I have not used this opportunity to derail the TWAO, which the coalition have managed to force through. I believe that by not putting that at risk, and giving them an opportunity to actually understand the proposal properly there is a better chance this time around of some of them refusing the whip and voting with good sense and their conscience. If they undertake this comparison it could be completed in time for them to reconsider whether they want to pursue their dream of a a concrete scar cutting across the landscape.

I hope that this time members of the administration attend a briefing by the CPPF to properly explain what their proposal is. That way many could approach this debate with a fresh pair of eyes and hopefully agree to directly compare the two proposals.


Leave a comment

C2C, essential infrastructure or gilding the lily?

In simple terms, if I must buy a car and two are in front of me, one is £2000, one is £22000, both very similar and appear to do the same job, then which one do I buy? The answer is neither; I take them for a test ride and ask for a mechanical inspection report before I make my mind up.

That is exactly what our amendment is proposing with regards to the Cambourne to Cambridge (C2C) busway proposal. The GCP largely segregated scheme, has positives such as a high-quality ride and reliable transport times. But fails when it comes to destroying an ancient orchard, has a massive price tag North of £200m, a low BCR of 0.43, it also performs badly with a large Carbon footprint and only delivers passengers into the suburbs of outer Cambridge.

Against the alternative proposal, put forward by Cambridge Past Present and Future (CPPF). It describes almost equitable benefits to the bus passenger, some increased times in one direction but improvements to other destinations and to general traffic, there is significantly less ecological damage saving the orchard from irreparable destruction, and all deliverable much earlier for the sum of £20m, less than 10% of the GCP proposal.

There is another reason why a delay and comparison is necessary, the government budget announcement, that East West Rail will be built and the route announced in two months time. This aspect alone has a massive impact on the GCP proposal. Imagine the same two cars again and the £22k model hasn’t changed in price but you realise £10k of the money is for a sound system you will never use.

We as councillors need to be certain we are doing the right thing before we make such an important, expensive and potentially destructive decision. That is why we are proposing this amendment to await the route of EWR and compare the two schemes, so we can come back in July fully prepared to make a final decision. 


4 Comments

Taxpayers to pay for Lib Dem led County Council mistakes

I’ve yet to see a press release and an apology, which is the least the public should expect as we reveal Cambridgeshire County Council (currently under Lib Dem, Labour & Independent control) have made an error by providing the District councils with the wrong council tax figures. This means that all the council tax bills the District Councils have printed are wrong. District Councils now face countless hours of extra work and thousands of pounds of taxpayers money to be spent correcting the error. It is yet unknown just exactly how much this disaster will cost but will be be in the tens of thousands of pounds.

Cllr Heather Williams Conservative Opposition Leader at South Cambs District Council says “What a waste of taxpayers money this has caused along with the massive amounts of paper and envelopes wasted. This was completely avoidable and a full review should be made to make sure this does not happen again as the cost will be huge. It will also mean that some residents will have to wait to find out their council tax bills giving them less time to plan and prepare, this is completely irresponsible”


Leave a comment

Concerns raised over County Council halting scams awareness support.

As chair of the Fenland Community Safety Partnership (CSP), I have raised concerns regarding the joint administration’s decision at Cambridgeshire County Council, to halt direct support for scams awareness programs, by sending the following letter.

Fenland CSP has become aware of the intention for Cambridgeshire County Council to stop the direct provision of scams protection.

On behalf of the partnership I’d like to register our disappointment at this decision as scams protection and raising awareness of current trends, prevention and reporting options, linked to scams is critical work to support those residents within Fenland who are most vulnerable to this type of exploitation.

The County Community Protection Team have been a vital contributor to the work Fenland Community Safety Partnership has completed over recent years in relation to scams and cybercrime prevention. They’ve supported our engagement events across all Fenland towns, supported prevention messaging during the COVID pandemic, share in real time current trends,  and support increased awareness of frontline professionals who work directly with the community and those considered most vulnerable.

Scams, Fraud and Cybercrime, as recognised in our 2022 Strategic Assessment, is an increasing problem and the loss of specialist services in the county which can support the vulnerable and those at risk of this crime type is in our opinion immeasurable.

As recent as January this year a recommendation contained within a Serious Organised Crime Local Profile, produced by Cambridgeshire Constabulary, was for Fenland CSP to continue to prioritise its preventive work in respect of scams, fraud and cybercrime. The recommendation states

“SOC Local profile Recommendation:

The CSP continues its recent efforts at awareness raising with key cohorts vulnerable to cyber-crime and fraud (students, the elderly, those with mental health conditions, the long-term lonely, etc.) through engagement events and other educational efforts; seeks advice from the Force’s cyber prevent officer to assist with event content (including identifying and contacting the most at-risk individuals in terms of fraud through OP Signature).”

It’s very unlikely the CSP will be able to fully deliver against this recommendation without the County Community Protection team and their expert knowledge and skills.

As you are aware, CCC are a statutory partner of Fenland CSP so we hope you can urgently revise your intentions, recognising that with the Cost Of Living pressures, the risk of criminals scamming our community will become greater.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Kind Regards

Cllr Steve Count, chair of fenland CSP


Leave a comment

Liberal Democrat led County Council to slash support for the most vulnerable

We all know money is tight and we have to cut our cloth to live in our means. However, the coalition running the county Council have decided that political priorities are more important than supporting the vulnerable. Having inflated the budget by over £50m in the medium term they now need to balance the books. Instead of revisiting their priorities they are choosing to attack support for the most vulnerable.

£352,000 is to be cut from the family safeguarding budget. Despite an Ofsted inspection last year March 2022 telling them case loads were too high and they have limited numbers of staff, they have chosen to delete 8 posts. These qualified professionals are vital to keep our vulnerable people safe and this decision is like telling Ofsted, that the Liberal Democrat led administration simply doesn’t care what their opinion is.

This isn’t the only area where services are being removed. Propped up by their Labour and Independent colleagues they also want to take £75,000 out of the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities budget. No details supplied, simply “It’s a non-statutory duty”. Why if it was deemed necessary for to have this service all these years, have they decided to cut it? And why haven’t they publicised what it is they are taking away from these vulnerable people?

In this post pandemic era you continually hear the outcry for more Mental Health support. The County Council has wide ranging responsibilities and impacts across the public sector, including direct responsibility for public health. One would have hoped there would be consideration for an expansion of services. Not this administration, they will cut £150k by not recruiting vitally needed mental health professionals, that there is a budget for.

Their lame excuse for all their budgeting is a lack of funding from central Government, whereas they still sit on reserves they Taxed residents of Cambridgeshire last year to increase. Our amendment reverses all of these proposed savage cuts, without even attacking their political expenditure. For them to carry on with these unnecessary cuts is simply unforgiveable.


Leave a comment

Weeds to be humanely relocated, is the only way to make new proposal more bizarre.

We plan to reverse their cut of £125k a year.

Their plan, to trial in Cambridge no more use of chemicals, or cyclic spraying, then spread to the whole of the County. New Weedkilling policy literally below in 1 to 4:

  1. Where we are notified of weeds by the community, we would assess and decide whether to remove the weeds
  2. Only weeds causing an immediate safety hazard would be removed.
  3. In response to the community notifying us, we would take up to two weeks to assess
  4. Any removal would take up to eight weeks from notification of the issue to removal (if that is what is decided by technical officers carrying out the assessment).

Drawn from official officer comments;

  1. Cyclic weedkilling using chemicals is the most efficient method of controlling weeds. (Literally ignored)
  2. Weeds can cause damage to path surfaces
  3. Weeds in the channels can cause damage to road surfaces
  4. Weeds in the channel can cause flooding
  5. Officers expect there to be an increase in public enquires and a reduction in satisfaction of the Highways service in general.
  6. CCC will spend £40k to sell this idea to Towns and parishes.